Reviews

• 

  UncleAmir

  Apr 3, 2022

  time to time i hate myself
• 

  Pashrick

  Nov 14, 2022

  Gameplay : ☑ Very good ☐ Good ☐ Nothing special ☐ Okay ☐ Bad Graphics: ☐ Has It's own style ☐ Masterpiece ☐ Beautiful ☑ Good ☐ Will do ☐ Bad ☐ Awful Story : ☐ Lovely ☐ Good ☐ Lore ☐ Average ☐ Not great ☑ None Difficulty : ☐ Just press a bunch of buttons ☐ Significant brain usage ☐ Easy to learn / Hard to master ☑ Difficult ☐ Dark Souls Soundtrack : ☐ Masterpiece ☐ Great ☐ Good ☐ Average ☑ Bad ☐ Terrible ☐ None Game Time : ☐ Short ☐ Average ☑ Long ☑ Depends on you ☐ Endless Price : ☑ Worth the price ☐ Wait for sale ☐ If you have some spare money left ☐ Not recommended Average Score : ☐ 10 ☐ 9 ☐ 8 ☑ 7 ☐ 6 ☐ 5 ☐ 4 ☐ 3 ☐ 2 ☐ 1 Additional note : Soundtrack is really bad.

  Only use "Best FPS Possible" shader available on workshop and on "potato" graphic settings .

  The game includes 30 level. All these levels need to be tested a lot of times as the game is about setting times for platform movements . And as controls are slow, none of these levels are going to be easy to complete.

• 

  Obey the Fist!

  Feb 25, 2023

  Time in Time is yet another of literally thousands of retro puzzle platformers infesting Steam and lowering the average quality of all video games everywhere. This one has a generic "robot" theme, not because robotics are interesting or cool, but because that was the only kind of low poly "art" the developer could work out how to do. Sounds lazy? Yep, and this carries on to the lazy level design and lazy premise for a copy + paste of a basic Unity platformer template. In fairness the levels also feature some timer mechanics, but this hardly pushes the boundaries of PC gaming as we know it. This game is so poorly made it would even be rejected on consoles, but it never made that far. Is that a win for console peasants? Who knows. From a technical perspective, the game doesn't meet basic minimum requirements that most PC gamers expect as standard. There's no options to change the resolution for the game or customise the graphics settings. There's no way for gamers to ensure this is running at the native resolution of their displays... there's no guarantee this game will look right on any PC as a result of this hamfisted design decision. There's no way for gamers to try improve the low quality graphics. The game features lazy low-polygon "retro" assets, making this look like a barely functional 3D game from the 1990s. It's unclear why the developers weren't able to arrange high quality, high polygon count contemporary assets for the game, and also irrelevant... what matters is that this looks bad as a result of their decisions, a compromise PC gamers shouldn't have to put up with. The controls can't be customised, which will be an annoyance for many, but it can also render the game unplayable for differently-abled gamers. These technical defects push this game below acceptable standards for any modern PC game. You don't have to take my word about how bad the game is, we can measure the interest in a game by how much people bothered to play it. Time in Time has achievements, and they show us a very clear picture that the game absolutely failed to capture any interest from gamers. The most commonly and easily attained achievement is just for completing the first demo/tutorial level of the game, and less than 3 percent of players bothered to get that far before uninstalling the game. That's a tiny, tiny proportion of gamers who even bothered with this. Ouch. Reviewing SteamDB to check how popular this game was with players reveals a surprise... there's a very healthy spike in player counts for the game. But this isn't consistent with the achievement stats, that show less than 3 percent of players bothered playing the game for any reasonable amount of time. How is it possible for this game to have so many concurrent players who weren't even playing the game? Trading cards. Players will use card idling software to collect the cards and sell them, but this won't trigger any achievements in-game. That tells us people only really bought this game for trading cards, and that's a damning indictment of the woeful quality. A closer look at the numbers shows the game just has a couple of players every week running up the game and idling it for cards, then deleting it. The game doesn't demonstrate any true popular appeal with gamers, most likely due to the reasons raised in this review. Time in Time is relatively cheap at $2 USD, but it's not worth it. Given the defects and quality issues with the game, coupled with the unrealistic price, this is impossible to recommend.
• 

  Poopsterbate

  Jul 23, 2017

  Well, Indie...Check Nice value on STC...Check Full controller support...Check Eye strain because of lame graphics...Check Difficulty...Eh Fun...Sure Workshop...Cool&Promosing Conclusion, Satisfy your need to kill some time when you are handling some other work and have some spare time.
• 

  gregorsamsa

  Jul 25, 2017

  A unique platformer with colorful graphics, also it has a workshop.
• 

  sillyboy

  Jul 27, 2017

  double jump so so so so so so so sooooooooooooooooooooo anti-human . I jumppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppp WTF? but ok nvm , I jumppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppp.................... 10 min later ....................... ok my space bar broken.
• 

  m o r b o

  Jul 29, 2017

  A simple and cheap little game that is good to spend a few hours with. PROS: The graphics are nice. The music is old school but appealing enough. The gameplay mechanichs are interesting CONS: The controls are a bit cluncky at first, they take a bit of time to get used to.
• 

  Zamynix

  Aug 5, 2017

  I actualy got this game from a coopon for 30 cents and im prety satisfied. Pros: - Really cool looking. - Colors and animations on the background match together so well. - workshop included. - 30 basic levels that are unique. Cons: - The SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS of the game are not that accurate - Controls are kinda complicated and don't give the 100% Hope i helped you !
• 

  Kembarra

  Aug 7, 2017

  increase the resolution and add more levels and it would be worth my time to play
• 

  triplelambepower

  Dec 31, 2017

  It's clever, but there is to much light pulsing on the screen, it gives an immidiate headache. You can't turn it off in the options because the menu is broken. I don't know what these guys where thinking about... It's like playing the rainbow road on Mario kart, but the entire game all the time... hurts your eyes and head, I really wanted to like this :(
• 

  LK

  Jan 9, 2018

  I personally thought this games difficulty is more due to bad design, there is a reason why all achievements have only been accessed by such a small amount of owners of this game. The poor controls are also a major factor in this. Controls are also not even key bindable (to my knowledge). Double jump should never be holding space, I am amazed I have to say that. I would also like to criticise the fact that the settings are not made available via the main menu and only via pausing the game, this was not known to me at first, and this was not helped by the fact that the music after only a few minutes was beginning to grate in my skull and that the graphics settings (also only accessible via main menu) decided to go on the highest possible setting by default, despite that causing a notable frame rate issue. I only paid 20p for this game due to a coupon per badge crafting, and after maybe 10 minutes at most am personally in the mood to refund. Maybe this game isn't meant for me, but I have a nagging feeling this game has flaws that need addressing.
• 

  Atacantul

  Jan 24, 2018

  The controls are really bad in my opinion
• 

  6xagon

  Sep 13, 2018

  Simple idea turns into great mechanics.. a different platformer with great soundtrack.
• 

  Siebentje

  Jan 3, 2019

  Great and original platformer. Some people don't like the controls, but they are fine in my opinion. The game has good graphics, an easy to use level editor and even a shader editor! This is a fantastic game for the price.
• 

  AgreroSam

  Dec 11, 2019

  As cheap as good, besides being very difficult. There are those who complain about the control, but it seems right to me, because after all you control a robot / unicycle, so it is logical that it moves like this. The mechanics of spending seconds is very good too. But I insist, it is very, very difficult. The graphics are also quite nice. 8/10
• 

  Sadly it’s Bradley

  Apr 25, 2020

  As cheap as good, besides being very difficult. There are those who complain about the control, but it seems right to me,
• 

  AloNyCh

  Apr 29, 2020

  6/10
• 

  Umut

  Oct 29, 2020

  time to time i hate myself
• 

  Gamenet

  Nov 27, 2020

  a fucking roboWhEeL-gay-shit game.. i leave this planet..